<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jing and Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearningservice.com/blog/2009/06/24/jing-and-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearningservice.com/blog/2009/06/24/jing-and-bing/</link>
	<description>for librarians and library organizations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:44:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kymm</title>
		<link>http://www.elearningservice.com/blog/2009/06/24/jing-and-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningservice.com/?p=2512#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.  Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.  Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.elearningservice.com/blog/2009/06/24/jing-and-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-7699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningservice.com/?p=2512#comment-7699</guid>
		<description>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detoxdiet</title>
		<link>http://www.elearningservice.com/blog/2009/06/24/jing-and-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-7560</link>
		<dc:creator>detoxdiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningservice.com/?p=2512#comment-7560</guid>
		<description>my initial test result shows that Bing is as good as Google when displaying relevant search results. Google might be having a tough competitor with Microsoft&#039;s own search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my initial test result shows that Bing is as good as Google when displaying relevant search results. Google might be having a tough competitor with Microsoft&#8217;s own search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
